The estimate comes from SellCell , which analyzed the 12-month resale performance of flagship smartphones from Apple, Samsung, Google, Motorola, and OnePlus. The site found that foldable smartphones lose an average of 64.6% of their value within a year, the worst depreciation rate of any smartphone category, compared with 55.3% for traditional smartphones. SellCell calculates that foldable phone owners lose $997.69 on average after 12 months, compared with $605.32 for owners of traditional smartphones, a gap of $392.37. MacRumors is the main source layer for now, and the rest should be read as a signal that is still widening. On the device side, the useful angle is whether a technical change actually alters feel, lifespan, or upgrade cost in real use.
What is happening now
The estimate comes from SellCell , which analyzed the 12-month resale performance of flagship smartphones from Apple, Samsung, Google, Motorola, and OnePlus. MacRumors form the main source layer behind the core facts in this piece. This is still a developing thread, so the useful part is knowing which source signals are hardening and which ones still need caution. With devices, practical impact usually shows up in battery life, heat, stability, and long-term usability rather than in a few flashy headline numbers.
Where the sources line up
MacRumors is the main source layer for now, and the rest should be read as a signal that is still widening. The site found that foldable smartphones lose an average of 64. 6% of their value within a year, the worst depreciation rate of any smartphone category, compared with 55. 3% for traditional smartphones. MacRumors form the main source layer behind the core facts in this piece.
The details worth keeping
SellCell calculates that foldable phone owners lose $997. 69 on average after 12 months, compared with $605. 32 for owners of traditional smartphones, a gap of $392. 37. On the device side, the useful angle is whether a technical change actually alters feel, lifespan, or upgrade cost in real use. The readers who should care most are the ones planning to replace a device, buy an accessory, or upgrade a work setup in the next few months. The next step is to see whether the current signals harden into a durable change or fade as a short-lived experiment.
Why this matters most
The signal is strong enough to deserve attention, but it still needs to be read as something developing rather than fully settled. With 1 source layers on the table, the part worth reading most closely is where firm facts meet the market's early reaction. Foldables retain just 35. 4% of their launch value after a year, versus 44. 7% for non-folding phones. The next step is to see whether the current signals harden into a durable change or fade as a short-lived experiment. That is why the useful reading move is not to stop at the headline, but to compare the promise, the workflow change, and the likely cost before deciding anything.
What to watch next
The next readout is price, device coverage, and whether the change feels real once the hardware reaches users. Patrick Tech Media will keep checking rollout speed, user reaction, and how MacRumors update the next pieces. From 1 early signals, the piece keeps 1 references that are useful for locking the main details in place. That is why the useful reading move is not to stop at the headline, but to compare the promise, the workflow change, and the likely cost before deciding anything.